Antifa Tactics Of Deception And RIP Greenwald

 

Welcome to the Endgame! With just days till the elections the tactics and methods of the globalists are coming into ever sharper focus. From my observations the Internationalist Left has received orders on multiple levels and commenced post-election operations to keep Patriotic America off-balance by staying ahead of the curve. As we have seen throughout 2020, the Media/Intelligence Complex creates crises at an accelerating rate, one coming during the midst of the previous to “flank” the previous defensive strategy before it can be fully implemented. The pivot from lockdown hysteria to BLM/Antifa rampaging was a perfect master-stroke of this technique. The organized resistance to the lockdown and stay-at-home agenda of the network of Governors were caught flat-footed when all of a sudden the Left poured into the street in masses (yet STILL remained committed to the crushing of ordinary human life). They were able to predict, somehow, that people would keep a childlike belief in face-diaper protection even while screaming in massed crowds of thousands. It was difficult to know what to make of this, especially with the fresh trauma of the Floyd video, though BLM/Antifa ended-up just being agents of the DNC political machine.

At this point I have honestly gotten fatigued of following the mainstream media narrative, the voice of all the “separate”corporate outlets is in such perfect unison these days that they don't have to try very hard to invent a convincing thread of events. The life of the “normies” who dote on Tony Fauci's every pronouncement is closer to a fast-cut, shaky-cam music video than a coherent plot. But we do get a bit of a window into the inner-workings now and again. Indeed, if one is alert all the enemies of the Republic are revealing themselves every day. It was telling, for example, how well the various media outlets managed to side-line the “Laptop From Hell” and ignore it completely or parrot the CIA line of "Muh Russia". Normally a Lefty journal like The Intercept would break such an easy "scoop" into the partial mainstream, making it viewable on Twitter and Facebook and then a bit of light would glean through. This time, veteran maverick Glenn Greenwald was blocked from publishing that story in The Intercept (which he founded) by the DNC controlled editorial staff less than a week out from the election. He has since resigned, posted the piece despite vague contractual threats, and published the e-mail exchange in which he was cold-cocked by his chums he had promoted to editors. A legend goes down to the blogosphere (though substack.com if probably the place to be if one has to go), but maybe he can take The Intercept down with him too.

It is safe to say that they are running scared by the relentless revelations coming through the blackout (partially due to the Streissand Effect) and the unreliability of partisan-based registration (exit) polling in a very dynamic election. When a Republican or Democrat casts their vote it is hard to say for certain who it was for as the political spectrum re-aligns itself around Nationalist/Globalist vectors. The oft-maligned threat of the “conspiracy theorist” menace is ascendant, as one would expect in the age of the “New Normal.”

Using this information about the failure of the mainstream to contain the narrative we can extrapolate some guesses about the future strategy of the Elites. Consistent with the “mad-dog” strategy we see a return to the BLM riots in Philly, NY, and DC. This is very odd so close to the election, but it might reflect a last-minute move to rally the troops in expectation of an election night defeat. The weather is getting colder and the energy has to be maintained before people get too cozy, and extra hands may actually help them ram through the necessary amount of fraudulent mail-in ballots. Having fanatical volunteers on hand is more useful for vote manipulation than the normal door-knocking, which the DNC disavows because of their morbid obsession with COVID. Only a relatively small number of ballots need to be fed into the right places if the race is close, so I expect that a premature switch to “Plan B” makes a good deal of sense. This also keeps them ahead of the curve, maintaining the initiative.

It is also possible that BLM has become more of a true renegade subculture and is going beyond the bounds of the handler's intent (or at least moving from a psy-op to a physical-op). Twitch banning all streaming of BLM from it's platform will keep the activities off Twitter and reduce the effectiveness of the Antifa provacation.If this is so, all the better: the sooner they find out what their supposed establishment allies will do to them the sooner they can be free of them. In many ways BLM is representing the multicultural coalition, but only the anti-White Whites and their allies. It could easily shift to a similarly multiracial alliance that is Pro-White Whites and their allies and helpful to Western Civ instead of harmful. This White on White violence is typical of the warring Europeans: teaming up with foreigners to beat up on each other. Most people of all races are happy to ally with Whites to get in on the plunder, so naturally they will gravitate towards the Pro-White Whites rather than those who want to kill the milk-cow rather than keeping it fed and comfortable.

If there is a shift to the Maidan-esque strategies we saw in DC in the Spring, then I predict the election will, sadly, not be over very soon. What we are going to have as mail-in "votes" trickle in over time instead is a struggle on the streets and in the courts which may or may not turn into a full-blown coup. While Patriots have been pumping up the base like in a regular election, we may have to be quite nimble soon. Difficulties will be compounded by the immanent lockdowns as the “casedemic” of over-testing proceeds. Recall that Europe was hit by lockdowns much earlier than the US and we are now witnessing history repeat itself. Although it is humorous on the face of it to destroy society over a mild flu-like virus, it is calculated to bring a sense of chaos and disorder, a non-stop cycle of hell that can only be stopped by a “return to normalcy.” Many nations have been destabilized and forsaken their duly-elected leadership to this end and none have gotten peace in the way they wanted it. Once you abdicate your elections all bets are off. Just as the next round of lockdowns will promise a road back to our lives “in a few months,” only to find that the lives we return to are lacking many basic liberties we take for granted; so the imposition of an unconstitutional transfer of power will promise stability if we just “let this one slide,” but that will be the end of the American Experiment in democracy.

We must stand firm that we want America to continue as is exists in the Constitution, and then we can iron-out the difficulties from there. The problem of drastic polarization makes this seem almost impossible. No matter the outcome, many many people will see the elections as illegitimate. The Blue States have initiated so many “COVID voting” rules that we will probably never be able to know for sure the extend of the fraud, but it is likely to be unprecedented. Poll watchers will not even be able to perform their usual function due to "social distancing," even aside from all the totally legal loopholes that have been rammed-through recklessly. A couple of extra votes per precinct can really add up, so it doesn't take much success from the operations that are ongoing in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and elsewhere; the courts will have to decide. In the environment of uncertainty the side that stands firm on moral ground will win: both groups are so large that members will cleave off the coalition until only those who truly believe that they are fighting for the highest cause remain. On the Right the cleaving has already mostly taken place, RHINOs and milquetoast patriots are long gone. I think the Left multiculti coalition will be pared-down if they encounter significant resistance, but they do have the power of most institutions rooting for them. Hopefully many of the devoted “revolutionaries” will lose their taste for destruction after sniffing manipulation in the air, but so far they are not making the connections suggested by their massive corporate and intelligence agency support.

This may not be the proper place for further war-gaming, except to say that the most vital thing is to establish secondary communication networks to distribute information and culture in the coming darkness. We do not have the option of waiting for feckless Senate hearings to bear fruit (they probably never will) we need to take control of the information environment ourselves. Most importantly, we need to engage in real-world interaction no matter the “danger” of "muh virus". [Syracuse City Hall Fridays, 12-2] If this results in another round of persecutions, like that suffered by the Russian Christians when the Bolsheviks took over (the greatest martyrdom in all human history) then may God have mercy on our souls!

What Would Orwell Do? Short-Term Strategy And Long-Term Ideas

 

I noticed more statues came down this week in Portland, sadly including a very beautiful bronze of Lincoln that I visited a couple of times when I was reading about the Civil War. The piece, by George Fite Waters, was good to meditate on as I pondered the complexities of the struggle and what it meant and still means for our nation. Lincoln was looking down and in a walking motion with one hand moving forward almost as if to receive someone's hand, but not quite; embodying the ambiguity of Lincoln. There was a hesitating quality to it, a tiredness, but also a sense of great determination. It called forth the mystery of the man and the time, and the mystery of the American experiment in general. It is fitting that Americans should still be debating the war so many years later. For such an epic bloodletting the conclusion was anti-climactic. The nation decided to move on, mouthing the same old platitudes about State's Rights they always had. Why argue about it when the point is moot? The war was fought, the blood was shed, precisely to avoid having more debates. The South was defeated, but actually gained congressional representation while managing to repress the vote of the Blacks. Grant was unable to establish a homeland for the freed slaves due to the greed of the Southern landowners and the anti-Catholic bigotry of the North who balked at admitting a new State of papists to the Union.

To this day, the more one learns, the more questions come to mind. Even the central figure himself is hard to pin down. What would he have done about the freed slaves had he survived? Would Reconstruction have succeeded if a Democrat VP had never gotten his hands on office of the Presidency? What motivated those poor men to face the dangers of the carnage at the front line? All these thoughts and more would fill me as I sat under the great, gaunt monolith. 

It is fitting that Lincoln was destroyed by mobs in 2020. The destruction and recreation of history in a manner amenable to Political Correct Orthodoxy is a constant theme of this contentious election year. The fraudulent 1619 Project (which the NYT eventually updated, clarifying that America was not actually created as a labor camp for African slaves) is perhaps the most prominent example of the push to fabricate historical context. Looking closer to the present we see the Mirriam-Webster Dictionary redefining the term "sexual preference" in response to its use in the Senate confirmation hearings just hours prior. Thus one can reasonably assume that Orwell's "1984" is in the last stages of manifestation in reality: the past is controlled to give power over the present and the future.

The main difference between the fictional work and reality is the private sector taking charge of censorship rather than "The Party". Maybe this is less concerning to some, but the effect and goals are the same. As of this week the political nature of the repression has become overt with Twitter locking the Trump campaign out of their official account. Whatever your opinions about the New York Post reporting on Joe Biden's corruption, it is a continuing escalation from banning mainly coronavirus discussion and topics deemed offensive. It does not surprise me, though. From the beginning of the censorship effort I've expected it to metastasize, if they are allowed to get away with it. After all, what monopoly has not abused it's power? 

No reasonable person can now deny the danger we are facing as a democracy. The disregard for freedom of speech has already tainted the election badly and the Minnesota-style fraud hasn't even begun yet. We have the intelligence agencies chiming-in (as usual) with their baseless claims that Hunter Biden's e-mails are another Russian plot. If this absurdity was the case, why hasn't Biden denied meeting with Burisma execs? Of course, he can't deny that he used his authority to interfere with the prosecution of Burisma because he bragged about it on camera. But the veracity of the e-mails will have to be proven, hopefully in a court of law trying the case. Any other outcome is a travesty and proof that we live in a true banana republic.

So what do patriotic citizens do when the intelligence community is determined to rig elections, the media is silent or complicit, and the Democrats have an army of lawyers already prepped to ram through as many harvested ballots as needed in the weeks following the election? Clearly the first step is to develop back-up lines of communication. Twitter is down right now, in damage control mode I presume. Facebook is tightening their restrictions and expanding their criteria for bans every day. During and after the election there will certainly be an attempt to control access to information, possibly including a shutdown of Twitter and Facebook and the usual shadow-banning by Google. Patriots need to have e-mail lists and outposts on other platforms. Once communications are established we can turn our attention to the task of discovering what has gone so wrong that citizens of the "land of the free" are cashing it in.

These networks may actually be the silver-lining behind the clouds. As the legitimacy of the two-party system fragments there is a new opportunity for new political associations to form. The Democrats have been hopelessly penetrated by foreign money and influence, corresponding to the internationalization of their financial backers. The Republicans have similar problems, and even when they remain loyal they are unable to learn how to fight back against the weapons of Critical Theory when it is weaponized against them. They should have learned by now that it is impossible to fight political correctness while being politically correct: you have already conceded the important mental territory at that point. This is one why the first places to fall to Big Tech Censorship were meme-generating sites and forums that everyone could agree were quite distasteful; not only are they hard for public figures to defend without themselves being smeared, but they are also engaging in cultural warfare through humor and mockery of political orthodoxy. Even Infowars was, at it's core, a silly place. The Trump subreddit r/theDonald was also also full of ridiculousness and probably started as a joke to troll the Bernie Bros, but it became to dangerous to tolerate because of precisely those reasons. Gab remains as a haven for meme generation (banned from Mastercard and on their own private servers), though most people will probably prefer Parler if they branch out from Twitter. As far as I know only one joke website (the Daily Stormer) has actually been banned from the internet so that it can only be accessed through the Dark Web, but I expect to see plenty more go.

For the more intellectually inclined I would refer you to a site I just found, Unrestrained Analytics, and particularly the linked article on the "soft coup" we are undergoing. It can be difficult to digest the tactics that are being used in this particular information war (the tendency is to get bogged down in the post-modern haze), but the article does a fairly good job:

This is not politics as usual but rather political warfare at an unprecedented level that is openly engaged in the direct targeting of a seated president through manipulation of the news cycle. It must be recognized on its own terms so that immediate action can be taken.

At its core, these campaigns run on multiple lines of effort, serve as the non-violent line of effort of a wider movement, and execute political warfare agendas that reflect cultural Marxist outcomes. The campaigns operate through narratives

It's crucial to understand the "non-violent" aspects of the culture war, because most of the violence is really intended as propaganda to aid the narrative formation. The media does not faithfully cover the violence of the Leftist revolutionaries, but they are all over any reaction from the citizenry. It doesn't matter who won the brawl, the narrative of the US as a hateful, violent, racist, place is further established. This narrative is designed to be destructive to any form of identity that does not fall into a victim category, and any identity that is a "victim" of American society is invested in the narrative that seeks to destroy America. This total atomization of the individual based on their grievance group then inevitably reforms as a monolithic entity in opposition to the social order that must be destroyed to make way for the "new normal," or the "great reset," or whatever branding they like to put on the new corporate totalitarianism. Any social cohesion that does not seek to destroy the nation is dangerous to Grandma or racist, or both.

The only way these ideas can thrive is in a totally a-historical context. Studying history shows us that there are positives and negatives to every action. The perfect is the enemy of the good. Ambiguity and uncertainty are natural to all humans and lurk behind the decisions of even the boldest leaders. But they managed to push forward, as should we. By failing to heed their example and relying on victim status we are encouraged to give up control of our destiny and put it into the hands of "experts" and "authorities." The first thing to go will be our right to speech and after that it should be smooth sailing for the internationalist oligarchy. 

Who knows how far this will go? In European countries they are now just outright arresting elected representatives in the Nationalist parties (to stop fascism, one presumes). The situation in the US is only different because we have a strong attachment to the Bill of Rights. If we lose our reverence for that document, if we lose our connection to our history, we lose our chance to continue this Great Experiment. It's hard

to be a Guinea Pig, but the eyes of the world are upon us, as usual, and they watch to see if liberty can make one more final stand on this fallen Earth.

Columbus Is Going Down, As Heroism Becomes A Naughty Word

 I saw in the paper yesterday that the Columbus statue in downtown Syracuse is slated to come down after all, where it will be "preserved" on private property. I don't personally have a problem with moving him, but it's downright insulting that we can't find a spot to put him in some lonely corner of the city where he won't be offending anyone. To be honest, I didn't really think much at all about the statue removal fad until President Grant was taken down in San Francisco. The long-suffering Grant can't catch a break these days, though in his time he was the most celebrated hero on the planet. Part of the appeal of Grant was his rags-to-riches success story. The noble loser who went from hauling firewood off his land in a hand-cart to hawk in the snow, to leading the greatest army ever assembled in North America. Grant was a true man of the people who undoubtedly saved the Union from destruction and the scandals of his Presidency didn't eclipse those facts until recent times when he has been smeared shamefully.

Grant's autobiography is a great read and is available on Youtube for free also. In contrast to the cringing and painfully careful McClellen, Grant's leadership style favored action and the initiative. In his first command of the war he encountered the hastily abandoned camp of some rebels he was trying to engage of which he wrote: "It occurred to me at once that Harris had been as much afraid of me as I had been of him." This lesson in courage was taken to heart and Grant was always keen to focus on his plans for inflicting punishment on the enemy, rather than dwelling on what they might do to him. This proactive mindset was key to overcoming the Southern rebellion, which was entrenched in a vast geographical area presenting insoluble challenges to a tradition supply-line. One after another the disciples of McClellan were bogged-down by operation difficulties and lack of intelligence, failing to realize that the Southern armies had the same challenges if not worse. By adhering to traditional military principles they became predictable and lethargic, whereas the impetuous Grant was able to secure the initiative time after time. 

So Grant and Columbus share at least one thing in common: boldness, For that we forgive them many of their flaws and honor them in stone and metal. Without the actions of bold men what would our world even look like? Perhaps we will live to see the answer once all of the heroes of the past have been felled and erased from history, Men like possible POTUS, Joe Biden, will lead the world from their basement, or getting dragged around by their hen-pecking wives. This is a future ruled by fear, with no room for courage or initiative. When so-called leaders are expected to hype up the danger of a virus comparable to the seasonal flu, I have to wonder how they could possibly be expected to handle a real crisis like the Civil War or forge new paths of discovery in the unknown. This kind of leader is only good for one purpose: scaring the population into submission while they take orders from the corporate oligarchs who are really setting policy.

So it's no wonder they want us to forget our history, a little perspective might make people less timorous and willing to hand over our God-given rights. The latest data on COVID death-rates puts it at one 0.1% for people under 70, pretty much 1/1000 odds of dying if you contract it. By contrast 2.5% of the US population died in the Civil War, the equivalent to 7 million deaths if it was fought today! We all pray for God to spare us from such disasters and tribulations, but history has a way of throwing curve-ball. Even if we avoid major conflicts there are still consequences to timidity, as McClellan's many failures taught Grant. Global NGOs are now predicting hunger the likes of which the world has never seen due to lockdowns and other economically disastrous policies, not to mention the hard that is being inflicted on an entire generation of youth. 

The best analysis of the virus panic has been presented recently by eminent scientists in their Great Barrington Declaration, which everyone should sign on to immediately. They review the weak results from lockdowns and offer a better solution called Targeted Protection, wherein the general population goes back to normal to establish herd immunity while protecting the at-risk. This not only avoids the collateral damage of draconian measures, but also allows the elderly and frail to return to normal much faster. All that is required is a little bit of courage, a quality that is losing its luster in the mainstream. As one would expect, the Declaration has been shadow-banned by Google and repressed by the other tech giants. This is what happens when we toss our heroes into the dust-bin and raise fearful mediocrity to undeserved glory.